My travels and meetings in southeastern Europe have been detailed in my
last eight blog posts and included visits to Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia &
Herzegovina, Croatia, Albania, Hungary, and Romania. The central event which drew me to this
region of Europe was LANDCON 1209 (the International Conference on Land
Conservation: Sustainable Land
Management and Climate Changes) held in the Danube Region of Serbia, September
17-21, 2012.
Route of our bus trip from the University of Belgrade to conference site on the Danube River |
WASWAC was founded in 1983 as a forum for soil and water
conservationists around the world. It
was originally based in the headquarters of a US organization, the Soil and
Water Conservation Society (SWCS), in Iowa but has since relocated to the
Institute of Soil and Water Conservation in Yangling, China. In the words of its current president, Dr. Li
Rui, WASWAC has devoted itself to a
worldwide promotion of the application of wise soil and water management
practices that will improve and safeguard the quality of land and water
resources. WASWAC currently has
around 5000 members from 120 countries.
It publishes a monthly Hot News,
a quarterly journal (Bulletin), and
books (periodically). Every three years,
WASWAC hosts a World Conference. The
next one will take place in Bangkok, Thailand this May (http://www.ldd.go.th/web_waswac2/index.htm). WASWAC also sponsors an international
cooperation program, holds training courses, and hosts a student forum.
WASWAC (like its original “parent” organization, SWCS) seems to primarily focus on soil and water conservation related to agriculture. It is also more of an academic and research-oriented organization in contrast to IECA which focuses more on applied erosion and sediment control related to construction projects. Therefore, it appears that the two organizations are complementary rather than competitors. I came away from LANDCON 1209 with the impression that our respective memberships have much to learn from each other. A number of the papers presented at the conference involved research on the nature of erosion and sedimentation, modeling, climate change, water quality, agricultural water and soil issues, as well as erosion and sediment control techniques similar to those employed by IECA members who work in the erosion and sediment control industry.
The conference venue was a comfortable (but not lavish) resort hotel in
the Serbian town of Donji Milanovac located in Đerdap National Park (that D with the line through it is kinda pronounced like a J) along the
Danube River gorge and across the river from Romania. It was attended by professors, other
environmental professionals, and students from at least 11 countries (by my
count). From introductory remarks by the
forestry school dean and park director, I learned that Đerdap National Park is
the largest of Serbia’s five national parks including 65,000 hectares (over 250
square miles) and following 50 miles of the Serbia-Romania border along the
Danube. Its biological diversity
includes 1,100 plant species, 200 birds, 50 mammals, and 60 fish.
Dr. Miodrag Zlatić (the ć is pronounced like ch) was the President of the Conference Organizing Committee and a Past President of WASWAC. He was the jovial forestry professor who picked me up at the Belgrade airport two weeks before the start of the conference and took me a Belgrade bar where we enjoyed (in his words) “glasses of conversation.”
In his introductory remarks to the participants, Miodrag spoke about the importance of these LANDCON (which stands for “land conservation”) conferences. He talked about the huge area of forest and grassland that has been lost to human development since the beginnings of agriculture and noted that the rate of loss is accelerating. However, “we are here because we are optimists”, Miodrag added. He also spoke of the importance of involving young people in soil and water conservation. This latter remark was most fitting given the large number of natural resources students (mostly from Serbia) who attended the conference. Miodrag felt that we are very knowledgeable about the technical aspects of soil and water conservation, but we need to better understand its social aspects. For example, “What do farmers think about conservation measures and what they have used historically?” Soil and water conservationists also need to look more toward problem solving such as the use of structural measures. And I thought to myself, “This is an area where IECA professionals have much to contribute”.
Miodrag also introduced attendees from various countries and organizations. The exuberant representative from Macedonia, Dr. Ivan Blinkov, even presented him with a bottle of Macedonian wine. I was introduced as the representative from IECA and conveyed my wishes for greater cooperation and coordination between IECA and WASWAC.
We then had a very interesting presentation from Dr. José Rubio, chair
of WASWAC’s International Cooperation and Development Committee. José
works at the Center of Investigations on Desertification in Valencia, Spain. He spoke about the “Global Soil Partnership”,
a 2011 initiative of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
In his presentation on international initiatives involving soil conservation, José Rubio led off with a simple message to grab our interest. |
José pointed out that many contemporary world problems are related to soil. When one considers that an already overcrowded world is becoming ever more crowded (mostly in developing countries), an adequate food supply is critical to ultimately preventing mass starvation. The challenge is to preserve soil while improving agricultural productivity and food supply. Thus, UN FAO member states have developed a Global Soil Partnership (GSP) with the vision of healthy and productive soils for a food-secure world. The mission of the GSP is to protect and enhance soil resources through both technological innovation as well as the development of best practices, standards, and guidelines.
This is nothing new for the UN FAO. In 1982, they adopted “a World Soil Charter spelling out basic principles and guidelines for sustainable soil management and soil protection to be followed by governments and international organizations” (http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/89277/icode/). However, as you can easily imagine, there have been delays in applying the charter in many countries, especially those where it is most needed. José said that a new World Soil Charter is needed with updates addressing new socio-economic, environmental, and demographic realities. This charter would need to address the challenges of soil biodiversity, the role of soil in a functioning ecosystem, and demographic changes.
In my opinion, these are worthwhile goals. However, my cynical side tends to get less
than enthusiastic about UN initiatives.
The problem is not with the UN itself.
It has to do with rampant corruption and/or misplaced priorities in some of
the member states. How can we hope to
improve soil resources, attack erosion and sedimentation, and ensure food
security in the neediest countries where ruling oligarchs often manage to suck
up aid money intended for community environmental initiatives? So, let the UN FAO set goals for us to emulate
but let’s apply our resources and talents in countries and communities where
they won’t be wasted and where they genuinely are welcomed.
In my next post, I will discuss more of the interesting presentations at the conference.